Shehu Criticizes INEC Appointment, Labels New Chairman a “Trusted Tinubu Appointee”

The political setting in Nigeria has once again been stirred following the appointment of Professor Joash Amupitan as the new Chairman of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC). Prominent political commentator, Mahdi Shehu, has openly criticized the appointment, calling the process a “one-man show” and alleging that political loyalty, rather than competence, drove the nomination.

Shehu’s scathing comments were shared on his X handle on Thursday, where he expressed disbelief at what he described as a “rubber-stamp confirmation” by the National Council of State. According to him, no member of the council would dare oppose the president’s choice, suggesting that the process was devoid of independent scrutiny.

“This is not news at all. No member of the National Council of State will have the audacity, guts, temerity and liver to oppose the one-man-show nomination of the new INEC chairman,” Shehu tweeted.

A “Trusted Tinubu Appointee”

Shehu mockingly referred to Professor Amupitan as a Trusted Tinubu Appointee (TTA), advising him to assume office immediately without worrying about Senate confirmation. He argued that the Senate, under longstanding political influence, would not block the appointment, highlighting a political pattern observed since 2015.

“He should not bother about the Senate because they can’t oppose his nomination as they have been standing on a common mandate since 2015,” Shehu wrote.

This statement underscores ongoing concerns about political interference in Nigeria’s electoral processes, raising questions about INEC’s independence, a topic that has dominated national debates for years.

Loyalty Over Integrity?

Continuing his critique, Shehu suggested that loyalty to the president, rather than integrity or competence, seems to determine such high-profile appointments. He mockingly advised the new chairman to immediately:

• Send his signature to all banks where INEC maintains accounts
• Review the commission’s budget by 500%
• Receive visitors from his local region, church, and donor agencies

Shehu also recommended that Professor Amupitan “pre-record the results of the 2027 elections on a hypothetical basis,” implying that political loyalty often overshadows transparency and accountability in governance.

“Remember that all INEC appointees, particularly the chairman, must direct 100% of their loyalty to he who appoints them. They have no business pleasing Nigerians or respecting the Constitution and that shallow INEC Act,” he added.

Historical Context of INEC Appointments

Nigeria’s electoral history reveals a recurring theme where INEC chairmen are seen as loyal to the appointing president. Critics argue that such loyalty compromises the commission’s neutrality, potentially affecting election credibility, voter trust, and democratic governance.

The debate over INEC’s independence is particularly relevant as Nigeria prepares for the 2027 general elections. Analysts warn that political interference could undermine public confidence and hinder efforts to strengthen democratic institutions.

What This Means for Nigerians

Shehu’s commentary reflects a broader frustration among citizens who question whether political loyalty outweighs competence in public appointments. The perception that high-profile positions are often reserved for political allies rather than qualified professionals fuels concerns about transparency in government and the integrity of electoral processes.

For Nigerians keen on democratic reforms, this development raises pressing questions:

• Can INEC function independently under a politically aligned chairman?
• Will election management remain transparent and credible?
• How will citizens hold the commission accountable during future polls?

Social Media Reaction

The news has sparked widespread discussions across social media platforms. Many Nigerians echoed Shehu’s concerns, while others defended the president’s prerogative to appoint individuals he trusts. Hashtags like #INECChairman and #TinubuAppointments have trended on X and other platforms, reflecting the polarized views surrounding the appointment.

Political analysts note that public perception is as important as actual competence. As the INEC chairman takes office, expectations are high for improved electoral transparency, irrespective of political affiliations.

Expert Opinions

Political science experts argue that appointments like these highlight the tension between executive power and institutional independence. Dr. Amina Yusuf, a governance analyst, remarked:

“INEC’s credibility depends on its perceived independence. Any suggestion that loyalty to the president supersedes electoral fairness can erode public trust.”

Experts also emphasize the need for robust checks and balances to prevent potential abuses of office, particularly in crucial institutions responsible for upholding democracy.

Moving Forward

As Professor Joash Amupitan assumes office, Nigerians will be closely monitoring his actions. Observers hope that despite political alignments, he will uphold the principles of transparency, integrity, and fairness in electoral management.

Meanwhile, Mahdi Shehu’s commentary serves as a reminder that political appointments are often scrutinized not only for the individual’s qualifications but also for the motives behind the appointment.

FAQs About INEC Appointments

1. Who appoints the INEC chairman in Nigeria?
The INEC chairman is appointed by the President of Nigeria and confirmed by the National Council of State. The Senate plays an advisory role but typically does not oppose presidential nominations.

2. What is the role of the INEC chairman?
The INEC chairman oversees Nigeria’s electoral processes, ensuring elections are conducted freely, fairly, and transparently. This includes voter registration, election logistics, and result collation.

3. Why is political loyalty controversial in appointments?
Political loyalty in appointments can compromise institutional independence, leading to biased decision-making, reduced public trust, and weakened democratic governance.

4. What are Nigerians saying about the new INEC chairman?
Public reaction is mixed. While some praise the appointment as a competent choice, critics argue it reflects political favoritism, potentially undermining INEC’s neutrality.

5. How can INEC maintain credibility under a politically appointed chairman?
Credibility can be maintained by upholding transparency, engaging civil society organizations, following constitutional mandates, and resisting political pressures during elections.

Nigerians are watching closely as Professor Amupitan takes the reins of INEC. Will he prioritize competence and fairness over loyalty? Only time will tell. Share your thoughts in the comments and let us know what you think about the new INEC chairman!